Ford goes big with solar power at Wayne Focus plant

August 19th, 2010

Christina Rogers / The Detroit News

Ford Motor Co. will build one of the largest solar energy systems in the state at its Wayne assembly plant to help power manufacturing of its electric cars, including the all-new electric Ford Focus, company officials said today.

The project is a partnership with Detroit-based DTE Energy — the state’s largest utility — and Xtreme Power, an Austin-based energy solutions firm.

Ford will install 500-kilowatts of solar panels at the Wayne plant, along with a battery storage facility that can store 2 million watt-hours of energy, enough to power 100 homes for a year, the company said.

Energy generated by the system will power production lines for the Ford Focus and Focus Electric, along with other hybrid-electric vehicles.

The Dearborn automaker expects to save about $160,000 a year in energy costs.

Good solar policy: What to look for

August 18th, 2010

By Liz Merry SOLAR TODAY “Ask Ms. Liz” Columnist

I was asked in my current Industry Orientation class why the solar industry is thriving in some places and anemic in others. My answer: To have a successful grid-tied solar photovoltaic (PV) market, you need basic policies in place. Because we have different policies in different states, and often in different utility areas, we essentially have about 55 different solar markets to deal with. Even more if you count different types of utilities.

However, Congress, yet again, has postponed national energy legislation, even though uniform pro-solar policies are vitally important for our collective clean energy future. When (or if) they do get to work on it, the legislation should contain some of the following elements that have proven key to creating a successful solar market.

First, you need a simple and realistic interconnection agreement. While many utilities claim to allow interconnection, there are often poison pills in place that effectively prevent a solar market. Such barriers include caps on the size of the system to be interconnected, caps on the cumulative amount of PV allowed on the utility grid, irrational insurance and/or equipment requirements or long, complicated interconnection agreements that require a lawyer’s review before submission.

Second, you need electricity to cost more than 10 cents per kilowatt-hour. The closer local electricity rates get to 20 cents per kilowatt-hour, on average, the more sound the economics of a PV project become. To reach these electricity rates and create a sustainable business model, utilities need to price electricity based on consumption. By charging premiums on those who large amounts of electricity, utilities encourage conservation, they also minimize the need for inefficient peak-load power plants, which often use natural gas to meet peak demand periods a few times a year.

Third, you need consistent, long-term incentives. Electricity is so inexpensive because the United States heavily subsidizes fossil fuel-based electricity providers through tax credits that have been in use for decades. (See this report by the Environmental Law Institute: elistore.org/Data/products/d19_07.pdf.) Renewable technologies are just becoming standardized, so the solar industry still needs incentives in the form of rebates and tax credits. The solar and wind industry would be satisfied with the size and types of consistent long-term subsidies being distributed to the fossil fuel industry. Instead, financial incentives for solar and other renewables are intermittent and short-lived, coming and going with each new election.

Fourth, the utility needs to provide retail net metering. As with interconnection policies, the devil is in the details. Retail net metering means that, when a PV system generates excess electricity and feeds it back to the grid, the system’s owner is credited 100 percent of the going rate for each kilowatt-hour. If the utility charges ratepayers 28 cents for a kilowatt-hour, then the PV-generated kilowatt-hour earns the PV system owner 28 cents. Net-metering programs may or may not allow system owners to earn more than 100 percent of their onsite load over a year-long billing period.

Finally, although it is becoming less of an issue in many states, solar access laws must be in place to support a strong solar market. Solar access laws prevent the enforcement of anti-solar laws based on aesthetics and protect solar access from shade created by foliage, remodeling activity and new buildings. Solar is a 30 to 40 year investment, so owners need to know their access to sunlight will be protected in that time frame.

If you are a policy advocate, this is a great time to begin your solar career by volunteering for pro-solar advocacy organizations such as the American Solar Energy Society (ASES) and your local ASES chapter, Solar Nation, Vote Solar, and the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and your local SEIA chapters. You can get involved doing anything from writing letters to the editor or your legislators and visiting your representatives personally, so they know you want clear, long-term, pro-solar policies — and you want them now. Volunteering now could help you land a job at a solar nonprofit or business in the future.

Solar grows in popularity nationwide

August 9th, 2010
by Nate Lew

Those who are thinking about installing a solar power system aren’t alone.
The growth of solar installations in the U.S. has been nothing short of meteoric. According to data from the American Solar Energy Society, the number of residential solar power installations in the country grew by 40 percent last year. That is even more impressive in light of the tepid economic conditions that prevailed in 2009, when millions of jobs were lost and gross domestic product contracted by 2.4 percent.

In fact, the editor of the society’s magazine, Solar Today, revealed to HousingWatch.com this month that solar has been growing at a breakneck pace for some time. In the U.S., Seth Masia said, “solar power installations have averaged about 35 percent to 40 percent annual growth over the past five years.”

To be sure, America has some catching up to do. Other developed nations have been installing clean energy for years, and the U.S. is still far behind nations like Germany and Italy in terms of total capacity. But solar could get a big boost in America if the drivers of its popularity in Europe – subsidies called feed-in tariffs – emerge here.

Some places already have FITs on a limited basis. Gainesville, Florida was the first U.S. municipality to make them available – and its program was fully subscribed in short order. Other FITs have been rolled out in the U.S.; Oregon is currently testing a pilot FIT program, for example.

What’s smart about FITs is that they shift the burden of subsidizing renewable energy projects from the government to electric ratepayers. FIT programs guarantee payment to those who generate clean power; rather than the rebates that are common in the U.S., they subsidize solar installations over 15 or 20 years.

It’s not clear whether they’ll be introduced on a broader scale. Utility policy is set on a state-by-state basis, so individual states will have to decide if they want to force utilities to pay more for clean energy. Some states, in lieu of FITs, are opting to impose renewable-power mandates on utilities; California, Colorado and New Jersey have the toughest renewable standards in the nation.

Whatever form solar subsidies take, though, solar energy should continue to be popular as long as incentives are provided to homeowners.ADNFCR-2111-ID-19906161-ADNFCR

NASCAR’s “tricky triangle” adds a new trick: solar power

August 4th, 2010

Pennsylvania’s Pocono Raceway, known to NASCAR fans as the “Tricky Triangle” for its unusual layout, is now home to a gigantic 40,000 panel solar power installation.  The new solar array broke ground last year and just went online this week.  It is expected to generate about 72 million kilowatt hours of clean power over a 20-year lifespan, and it is believed to be the largest solar installation at a sports facility in the world. 

The new solar array will offset more electricity than the raceway uses, leaving enough left over to power about 1,000 homes.  The track’s owner, Dr. Joseph Mattioli, sees the $18 million investment in solar energy as a potential profit center for the facility, and he foresees the potential for future expansion.  If he can make it work, don’t be surprised to see solar panels sprouting up at other points on the NASCAR circuit in the near future

In commitment to solar energy, Pennsylvania sees neighbors pull ahead

July 28th, 2010

 By Diane Mastrull – Inquirer Staff Writer

For the solar industry in Pennsylvania, Wednesday is a day of envy.  

At 10 a.m., Delaware Gov. Jack Markell is to sign a legislative measure boosting his state’s commitment to alternative energy, including a promise to get 3.5 percent of its electricity from the sun by 2025.

It is the sort of event solar installers had hoped to be celebrating by now – in Pennsylvania.

Those ambitions fizzled, however, when the legislature recessed right after passing the state budget on July 3, effectively killing any chance this year for adoption of the long-debated House Bill 2405.

That legislation would have upped the state’s obligation to use a variety of clean-energy options. Of most value to the state’s fledgling solar industry: H.B. 2405 would increase from 0.5 percent to 3 percent the amount of solar power utilities would have to provide by 2024.

The current minimum of 0.5 percent by 2021 has been in place since 2004, when Pennsylvania first instituted alternative energy use standards.

With Delaware moving to 3.5 percent, Maryland to 2 percent, and New Jersey setting new megawatt requirements that equate to about 3 percent, Pennsylvania is losing solar ground in the region. That puts it at risk of losing the approximately 600 solar businesses it has and being unable to lure others, industry advocates contend.

So instead of waiting until next year to renew the push for passage of H.B. 2405, solar proponents are launching a new plan of attack.

They want the legislature to embrace the idea of a stand-alone bill that would hike the state’s solar-energy requirements only. That would leave other aspects of the controversial H.B. 2405 – nuclear power and clean coal, for instance – for later consideration.

“It’s really important we have this bill to move the industry from a rebate-dependent energy source to a more market-driven energy source,” Maureen Mulligan of Sustainable Futures Communications said in an interview. She is the chief lobbyist in Pennsylvania for the two largest solar-energy trade associations in the region: Solar Alliance and the Mid-Atlantic Solar Energy Industries Association/Pennsylvania division.

Mulligan will attempt to make her case for a solar-only bill at a House Majority Policy Committee hearing on alternative-energy issues in Worcester, Montgomery County, Wednesday afternoon.

In an interview Tuesday, John Hanger, Pennsylvania’s environmental secretary, said a solar-only bill “would be certainly better than doing nothing in the fall.”

“What’s troubling is we’re falling behind neighboring states,” Hanger said. “The competitive impact is even greater than if we were falling behind Arizona.”

H.B. 2405 had been opposed by Pennsylvania’s dominant coal industry over fears that enhanced requirements for alternative-energy sources would cut into its market share and put miners out of work.

The measure was also opposed by the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry because, among other reasons, it prioritized some forms of alternative energy over others. A solar-only legislative proposal “doesn’t change our thinking on the issue,” especially given that solar “is the most expensive component” of the state’s alternative-energy mandate, said Eugene Barr, vice president of government and public affairs for the chamber, whose members include both coal and solar businesses, he noted.

H.B. 2405’s prime sponsor, State Rep. Eugene DePasquale (D., York), said Tuesday he is willing to sponsor a solar-only initiative, but “I don’t want to raise anyone’s false hopes – I saw what happened with 2405.”

He won’t have much time. Just 17 legislative days are left in the year when the House returns to work on Sept. 13; the Senate on Sept. 20, Mulligan said. Plenty of weighty issues already await attention, including a proposed severance tax on natural-gas extractions from the Marcellus Shale, and transportation concerns.

Among those hoping legislators will make room to consider a solar bill is Jim Pierobon, vice president of policy and market development for Standard Solar. The Maryland-based company would have offices established in the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh areas within three to six months of passage, Pierobon said.

Half of New Power in U.S. Last Year Came from Renewables

July 22nd, 2010

America continues pushing toward cleaner energy today - by Tiffany Kaiser

 The UN-supported organization, Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21), conducted a study that shows half of new power generated in the United States in 2009 was renewable energy. 

The U.S. has taken great strides toward mass use of renewable energy. Just last year, 10 gigawatts of wind power capacity was installed in the United States, which can power 2.4 million homes. Other advancements in clean energy were made last year as well, such as the $7 million grant for Argonne National Laboratory from the U.S. Department of Energy to further solar power research. 

More recently, the Obama Administration has continued contributing funds to keep renewable energy research rolling along. In April, the U.S. government approved the country’s first off-shore wind farm, despite those who protested the idea, and just this month, Obama gave a hefty sum of $1.85 billion for new solar energy plants to be built around the U.S.  In addition, a promising 73 percent of Americans want to cut fossil fuel dependency in favor of cleaner methods. 

While the U.S. is moving along in regards to green technology, other countries around the world have been joining the revolution for a cleaner planet too by implementing new ideas in green technology. 

In Europe, 60 percent of new power generation in 2009 was in the form of renewable energy. But China has made the most progress when it comes to green technology by manufacturing more solar panels and wind turbines than any other country, as well as adding of 37 gigawatts of renewable energy to China’s overall power generation capacity. Worldwide, renewable energy accounts for 25 percent of total power generation and provided 18 percent of the Earth’s electricity in 2009. 

Despite these strides in the growing use of renewable energy, the U.S. has a long way to go before they accomplish the U.S. Department of Energy’s goal of having 20 percent of America’s power derived from wind by 2030.

Solar pumps replacing windmills

July 19th, 2010

By MATT JOYCE • Associated Press • July 19, 2010

ALCOVA, Wyo. — The pump installer toppled the old windmill in about an hour. First he scaled the wobbly 27-foot tower to stop the broken mill’s whirling blade and then pulled the underground pipe to make way for a new solar-powered electric pump.

Iconic mechanical windmills of metal and wood have, for 150 years, pumped life into American ranches and farms in remote locations beyond the reach of power lines. But these days more and more Western ranchers are pulling them down and converting to solar-powered systems.

“They are displacing windmills every day,” said Scott Blakeley, owner of Pronghorn Pump and Repair in Glenrock, as he traveled to an installation job on a ranch southwest of Casper. “Primarily because of the mechanical problems that you have. You fix one issue on a windmill today, something else is broke tomorrow. And in August, when you need water the most, the wind blows the least in Wyoming, and in most Western states.”

Ranchers use windmills and other pump systems to open more land for grazing by drawing well water for livestock in areas without surface water. Blakeley, who has also installed solar pump equipment in Utah, Montana and Colorado, said the solar segment of his business grows by about 35 percent per year.

Solar-powered pumps have been available for more than 20 years, but their efficiency and durability now have reached the point that many ranchers are at least considering them when they need to replace an old windmill or drill a new well.

Solar pump costs vary widely — from $4,500 to more than $10,000 — and still often exceed typical windmill replacement or repair costs.

“If [windmills] are working and meeting the needs of the farm, there’s not a reason to go change it,” said Mike Morris, farm energy team leader for the National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service. “But when it breaks and you have to do something different, I would think that if you’re far from power, solar is going to be extremely competitive if not the best option in many or most cases.”

They normally require less upkeep and break down less often than windmills, which include more moving parts that can wear out, Morris said. Ranchers using solar wells can endure cloudy days by building tanks big enough to hold several days worth of water for their livestock, Morris said.

“In the West it’s much more common to be far from power,” he said. “In the Midwest or East, very often where you need the water, you might be within a quarter mile of power. In that situation, really there is no reason economically to go with solar.”

Despite the solar trend, windmills are unlikely to disappear from the landscape. Many ranches that relied on windmills for generations have the know-how and equipment to keep their windmills operating. And some companies said their windmill-related sales remain strong.

Peg Muller, owner of Muller Industries Inc., a manufacturer and wholesaler of windmills and windmill parts in Yanktown, S.D., said solar wells have had no impact on her business, which sells to customers across the country. Some ranchers don’t want to experiment with new systems or are discouraged by the price, Muller said.

“It seems like maybe you lose an account over here and you pick up another over here,” Muller said. “It really hasn’t affected our business. There are tens of thousands of windmills out there.”

For Randy Marton, the Wyoming sheep and cattle rancher who hired Blakeley to replace his broken windmill with a solar pump this month, the new well’s $4,500 cost was worth it. Marton said windmill repair workers are hard to find and maintenance costs are expensive.

“If you look at the average age of ranchers in Wyoming, they’re all getting to be about my age or older — they’re not going to crawl up these windmills anymore,” said Marton, 58.

DNREC offering grants for going green, reducing global warming

July 16th, 2010

Thank you to Jon Lavin from ABC for  this useful information on DNREC’s  new program: 

DOVER – The Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control has launched a new grant program aimed at helping businesses, state and municipal agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), academia and/or non-profit assistance providers identify and implement plans to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases in their organizations and communities. The grant program marks a milestone in Delaware’s fight against climate change. 

DNREC is now accepting applications for $1.4 million available in the first round of funding under the Delaware Greenhouse Gas Reduction Projects Grant program. The program is funded by a portion of the proceeds from the auction of carbon dioxide allowances through the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative’s (RGGI) cap-and-trade program that is working to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants in the Northeast and Middle Atlantic states.

The deadline for applications is September 15. DNREC expects applicants to demonstrate that proposed projects will result in measurable reductions of greenhouse gases. Eligible projects may include those that help grantees calculate and reduce their carbon footprints as well as land-use and transportation planning efforts that reduce the need to drive. Vehicle exhaust contributes a significant portion of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions. 

DNREC will also consider projects that spur development of green infrastructure, programs that foster resource conservation such as better management of trees, efforts to strengthen local economies through marketing of locally grown food, and outreach programs that promote public involvement in sustainability efforts. 

Pennsylvania Invests $24 Million to Support Alternative Energy Projects; Help Businesses Schools Conserve Energy Cut Costs

July 14th, 2010

 Author: Theresa Elliott

37 Projects in 16 Counties Will Save 26,600 Megawatt Hours of Electricity Each Year

Harrisburg – Pennsylvania is expanding its commitment to advancing clean, solar energy with the investment of $24 million in 37 projects in 16 counties, Department of Community and Economic Development Secretary Austin Burke said today.

“These new projects are creating jobs while helping to make the development and deployment of solar technology more affordable,” Burke said after the projects were approved by the Commonwealth Financing Authority on July 7. “Ultimately, this means substantial energy savings for families, businesses, schools and municipalities that use clean, renewable technologies.”

The 37 projects, approved through the state’s solar energy program, are in Adams, Allegheny, Beaver, Berks, Bucks, Chester, Cumberland, Franklin, Lancaster, Lawrence, Lehigh, Montgomery, Northampton, Philadelphia, Schuylkill and York counties. They are expected to leverage nearly $88 million in private investments.

The solar projects will have an installed capacity of more than 24 megawatts and will generate at least 26,600 megawatt hours of electricity annually, or enough to power approximately 2,700 Pennsylvania homes. In addition to generating 26,600 solar renewable energy credits a year, the systems will annually save $5.2 million during each of the next 20 years.

Burke said one of the projects, Frazer/Exton Development LP, will receive a $2.7 million solar energy program grant for the purchase and installation of a solar photovoltaic system next to Makamie at Whiteland, a planned senior housing community to be developed in East Whiteland Township. The 1,800-kilowatt, ground mounted system will generate 2.3 million kilowatt hours of energy annually, which could save the facility $286,000 in annual energy costs. The $8.6 million project will leverage an additional $5.8 million in private investment.

The Commonwealth Financing Authority administers Pennsylvania’s economic stimulus programs, including portions of the $650 million Alternative Energy Investment Fund that Governor Rendell signed into law in 2008.

Solar Energy Use Grows Despite the Great Recession

July 13th, 2010

By Thomas Ajava 

2008 and 2009 were brutal years thanks to the Great Recession. No business area got through it without being pummeled to one extent or another. Well, there were exceptions. Surprisingly, solar energy was one of them.

Solar energy has long been known to be the perfect clean energy source, but it has always been to expensive to really become popular on a large scale. Well, no more. Federal, state and even local governments now offer major financial incentives to those who pursue it. The cost of systems has also dropped dramatically as supply has built up. Throw in the savings on utility bills and you have an energy source that is suddenly popular. How popular? Residential solar energy generation doubled from 2008 to 2009.

Think about that for a minute. Residential solar panel sales were way up in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression. This would seem to suggest that the energy platform has turned the corner and become a viable, realistic energy source in the modern world, no?

Don’t get me wrong. Solar still has a long way to go. It produces less than one thousandth of the total energy in the United States. That being said, imagine how it will ramp up if the economy gets cruising again. If sales doubled in a bad year, one can only imagine how well they will do in a good economic environment.

Unfortunately, the residential solar panel movement is not a uniform one across the country. California has the most installations by far. It is followed by New Jersey, Florida, Arizona and Colorado. New Jersey?  Yes, which also proves that solar panels are viable well beyond the Sun Belt.

So, does this mean we’ll see solar panels on every home in the next couple of years? Of course, not. Still, there is no denying that things are headed that way.